by
Martin L. Pall, PhD. and Robert Gorter, MD, PhD.
December 23rd 2020
Oxygen the atom is O. Oxygen gas is the molecule is 02: two atoms together. These two atoms form the oxygen molecule and share some electrons. 60 GHz causes electrons surrounding oxygen molecules to spin, akin to how high-powered microwaves running on 2.4 impact molecules in food such as water. They’re heating, in part, by impacting those molecules to rotate or oscillate with each wave. The movement energy from the rotation of these super tiny water molecules helps heat the rest of the food.
In a similar way that 2.4 causes H20 to oscillate, 5G/60 GHz even at low power causes electrons on oxygen molecules to spin; changes to the spin frequencies on oxygen electrons impact human biology.
The impact of oxygen molecules spinning the electrons is that it makes the hemoglobin unable to uptake the oxygen and get it to the rest of one’s body.
60GHz Wireless Network
60GHz V-band wireless has many technical advantages as High Speed links or lack of interference. The 57-64 GHz band is located in the millimeter-wave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, where the wavelength varies from ten millimeters (30 GHz) down to one millimeter (300 GHz).
Oxygen Absorption of 60GHz
Point-to-point wireless systems operating at 60 GHz have been used for many years by the intelligence community for high security communications and by the military for satellite-to-satellite communications. Their interest in this frequency band stems from a phenomenon of nature: the oxygen molecule (O2) absorbs electromagnetic energy at 60 GHz like a piece of food in a microwave oven at 2,4 GHz. This absorption occurs to a much higher degree at 60 GHz than at lower frequencies. This is a evil plan to kill our nature. This 60GHz wireless network should be stop immediately. Also ignorance of people is involved. We need your help to stop this.
60GHz Wireless Networks
Adverse Health Effects of 5G Mobile Networking Technology under Real-life Conditions
This article identifies adverse effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) reported in the premier biomedical literature. It emphasizes that most of the laboratory experiments conducted to date are not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of the real-life operating environment in which wireless radiation systems operate. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal.
The vast majority do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli (such as chemical and biological) acting in concert with the wireless radiation. This article also presents evidence that the nascent 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, as commonly believed, but will have adverse systemic effects as well:
- Identifies wide-spectrum of adverse health effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation.
- Most laboratory experiments were not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of real-life conditions.
- Many experiments do not include the real-life pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal.
- Vast majority of experiments do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli with wireless radiation.
- 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, but will have adverse systemic effects as well: especially to the heart as it waves are pulsed and degenerative destruction to the central nervous system (including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Parkinsonism and peripheral neuropathies).
We know that there is a massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures. This is shown in from 12 to 34 reviews on each specific effect, with each review listed in Chapter 1, providing a substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect. Such EMFs:
- Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.
- Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems –even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus the consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems are immense, such that it is a travesty to ignore these findings.
- Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially all chronic diseases.
- Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.
- Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
- Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
- Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.
- Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation.
There is also a substantial literature showing that EMFs also cause other effects including life threatening cardiac effects (arrhythmias and heart block). In addition, substantial evidence suggests EMF causation of very early onset dementias, including Alzheimer’s, digital and other types of dementias, and there is evidence that EMF exposures in utero and shortly after birth can cause ADHD and autism.
Each of these effects is produced via the main mechanism of action of microwave/lower frequency EMFs, activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). Each of them is produced via what are called downstream effects of VGCC activation. It follows from this that we have a good understanding not only that these effects occur, but also how they can occur. The extraordinary sensitivity of the VGCC voltage sensor to the forces of the EMFs tells us that the current safety guidelines allow us to be exposed to EMF levels that are something like 7.2 million times too high. That sensitivity is predicted by the physics. Therefore, the physics and the biology are each pointing to the same mechanism of action of non-thermal EMFs.
The different effects produced are obviously very deep concerns. They become much deeper and become existential threats when one considers that several of these effects are both cumulative and eventually irreversible. There is substantial evidence for the cumulative nature and eventual irreversibility of the neurological/neuropsychiatric effects, of the reproductive effects, the mutational DNA effects, the cardiac effects, of some but not other of the hormonal effects; any causation of ADHD and autism may add additional concerns (here the cumulative nature is probably limited to the perinatal period). When we know that sperm counts have dropped by more than 50% throughout the technologically advanced countries on earth, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the vast majority of the population in those countries is already substantially impacted. The same conclusion can be made based on the widespread nature of the neuropsychiatric effects in those countries. Both of those effects will get much worse even with no increase in current exposures, due to the cumulative nature and irreversibility of these effects. I expect we will see crash in human reproduction almost to zero as happened in the Magras and Xenos mouse study which I estimate to occur within about 5 years, without any increases in our exposures. Obviously 4G and 5G will make the situation much worse. Similarly I expect that the deterioration in brain function that we are already seeing will seal our fate if we fail to act rapidly and vigorously. Our collective brain function may become completely incapable of dealing with such a mega-crisis situation.
Now it can be argued that some of these may not develop as I expect, although those expectations are based on the best available evidence. One may even be able to argue this for all of those expectations. However, when we have substantial risk of multiple existential threats to every single technologically advanced country on earth, failure to act vigorously means there is a very high probability of complete destruction of these societies. And the chaos which would inevitably ensue, in a world that still has nuclear weapons, may well lead to extinction. In the face of these types or risk, the only reasonable course is to move with great vigor to stop new exposures and lower current exposures. One can still access the internet, using wired connections. And we can lower cell phone tower and cell phone radiation substantially. Smart meters, if needed,can work via wired connections.
Over 60% of this document, is focused on the failures of statements from SCENIHR, the telecommunications industry, the U.S. FCC and the U.S. FDA to reflect the science. Their statements repeatedly omit much, often all of the most important science. Their statements are rife not only with omissions, but also with easily demonstrable falsehoods and with false logic. These have often occurred at times where we know that they knew better. These have occurred along with vigorous efforts by the telecommunications industry to corrupt the science by attacking individual scientists whose only fault is that they have obtained important findings that the industry does not like. These attacks have occurred along with vigorous efforts to corrupt two agencies that have important regulatory roles.
There are also possible concerns about individual industry-linked research studies. All wireless communication devices put out polarized EMFs that carry information via pulsations. Both the pulsations and the polarization make these EMFs much more biologically active. There are three other factors that also influence the production of effects. Several industry-linked studies may have used these factors, along with using very tiny numbers of individual animals in their studies, to produce studies which may have been designed to fail. It is not clear at this point whether this type of concern is quite limited or whether it is very broad.
The European Commission has done nothing to protect European citizens from any of these very serious health hazards and the U.S. FDA, EPA and National Cancer Institute have done nothing to protect American citizens. The U.S. FCC has been much worse than that, acting vigorously with wanton disregard for our health.
Role of Pulsations, Other Factors that Influence EMF Effects
Both the earlier Ryan document and the more recent Arūnas document each fail to pay any attention to the extensive scientific literature that has been accumulated on non-thermal electromagnetic field (EMF) effects. The scientific consensus of independent scientists based on information accumulated over the last 7 decades is just the opposite of what each of them states. There is series of 8 extremely well-documented effects of such EMF exposure, together with a list of review articles, most of them being peer reviewed articles published in well-respected journals in the PubMed database, that have each reviewed a body of evidence demonstrating the existence of each such effect.
What are the effects produced by non-thermal exposures to microwave frequency EMFs, where we have an extensive scientific literature? Each of the following effects has been documented in from 12 to 34 reviews
Three types of cellular DNA attacks, producing single strand breaks in the cellular DNA, double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in cellular DNA. Each of these DNA changes has roles in cancer causation and in producing the most important mutational changes in humans and diverse animals. Double stranded DNA breaks produce chromosomal breaks, rearrangements, deletions and duplications and copy number mutations; they also produce gene amplification, an important mechanism in cancer causation. Single strand breaks in cellular DNA cause aberrant recombination events leading to copy number mutations. Oxidized bases cause point mutations. When these occur in somatic cells, they can each have roles in causing cancer. When these occur in germ line cells (and they have be shown to occur in sperm following EMF exposures), they cause the three most important types of mutations in future generations, chromosomal mutations, copy number mutations and point mutations. (21 different reviews documenting these types of cellular DNA damage)
A wide variety of changes leading to lowered male fertility, lowered female fertility, increased spontaneous abortion, lowered levels of estrogen, progesterone and testosterone, lowered libido (18reviews). Human sperm count has dropped to below 50% of what used to be considered normal throughout the technologically advanced countries of the world [1]. Reproductive rates have fallen below replacement levels in every technologically advanced country of the world, with a single exception. These include every EU country, the U.S., Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand. Reproduction averages, in these countries, about 73% of replacement levels according to 2015 or 2016 data. A study on mouse reproduction showed that radio/microwave frequency EMF exposure at doses well within our current safety guidelines produced substantial dose-dependent decreases in reproduction within 5the first set of litters; further exposure produced dose-dependent complete or almost complete sterility that was found to be largely irreversible. When we have a technology that is universally present in these technologically advanced countries, that we know impacts reproduction, and reproduction has already dropped well below replacement levels, and we may be facing a catastrophic and irreversible decline in reproduction and there are more and more plans to expose us still further, don’t you think that we should take note of the science? Mr. Ryan and Dr. Vinciūnas seem to be saying not at all. (Please note that the U.S. FCC and FDA also completely ignore this existential threat
Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects (25 reviews). Pall’s paper on this[3] and two earlier reviews cited in it found that there are whole series of repeatedly found EMF effects which have also become extremely wide spread complaints in our technologically advanced societies, namely: sleep disturbance/insomnia; fatigue/tiredness; headache; depression/depressive symptoms; lack of concentration/attention/cognitive dysfunction; dizziness/vertigo; memory changes; restlessness/tension/anxiety/stress/agitation; irritability. These findings are not just based on epidemiological findings but are also based on profound impacts of EMFs, at levels well within our safety guidelines, on brain structure and function and also on the mechanism of non-thermal EMF action discussed below. When we have these neuropsychiatric effects becoming more and more common in technologically advanced societies all over the world, and we know each of these is caused EMF exposures, shouldn’t we take note of this relationship?
Apoptosis/cell death (13 reviews). The two most important consequences of large increases in apoptosis (programmed cell death) are in causation of the neurodegenerative diseases and lowered reproduction although there are others.
Oxidative stress/free radical damage (19reviews). Oxidative stress has roles in all or almost all chronic diseases. It is reported to have essential roles in producing the reproductive effects and the attacks on cellular DNA and may also have roles in producing the neurological effects and some of the cancer-causing effects shown to be produced here by EMF exposures.
Widespread endocrine (that is hormonal) effects (12reviews). The steroid hormone levels drop with EMF exposure, whereas other hormone levels increase with initial exposure. The neuroendocrine hormones and insulin levels often drop with prolonged EMF exposure, possibly due to endocrine exhaustion.
Increases in intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) levels following EMF exposure (15 reviews). Calcium signaling also increases following EMF exposure.
Cancer causation (35 reviews). Brain cancer, salivary cancer, acoustic neuromas, Schwannomas, prostate cancer and two other types of cancer go up with cell phone use. People living near cell phone towers have increased cancer rates. Other types of EMFs are each implicated. Short wave radio, radio ham operators and people exposed to radar all are reported to have increased cancer incidence. Perhaps most telling, heavy-long term cell phone users have the highest incidence of brain cancer and have predominantly cancer increases on the ipsilateral side of the head (the side they use their cell phones), as opposed to the contralateral side. I have a paper, focused not on whether EMFs cause cancer but rather on how they can cause cancer. The paper shows that ”downstream effects” of the main target of the EMFs in the cells of our bodies, can cause cancer in 15 different ways, including increases in cancer initiation, promotion and progression. Progression effects include both tissue invasion and metastasis. Each of these cancer causation effects are caused via mechanisms produced by downstream effects of the main non-thermal EMF mechanism, as discussed.
Therapeutic effects of such EMFs. Such EMFs when focused on a specific region of the body where there is some dysfunction and when used at specific intensities, can have therapeutic effects. In my 2013 paper, I cited 12 different reviews where EMF stimulation of bone growth was used therapeutically. There are something like 4000 papers on various therapeutic effects. Strangely, the telecommunications industry does not acknowledge these therapeutic effects, preferring rather to maintain the fiction that there are no non-thermal effects.
There is another set of reviews, in this case, with each showing that pulsed EMFs are, in most cases, much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs. This is particularly important because all wireless communication devices communicate via pulsations, making them potentially much more dangerous. It follows from this that if you wish to study the effects of Wi-Fi, cell phones, cordless phones, cell phone towers, smart meters or 5G you had better study the real thing or at least something that pulses very much like the real thing. There are many studies that don’t do this, but falsely claim to be genuine Wi-Fi, cell phone or cordless phone studies. Other factors that influence the occurrence of non-thermal EMF effects include the frequency being used, the polarization of the EMFs and the cell type being studied. Furthermore there are intensity “windows” that produce maximum biological effects, such that both lower and higher intensities produce much less effect. These window effect studies clearly show that dose-response curves are both non-linear and non-monotone, such that it is difficult or impossible to predict effects based on relative intensity even when all other factors are the same. The role of each of these factors is completely ignored by ICNIRP, SCENIHR, the U.S. FCC, FDA and National Cancer Institute as well as by many other industry-friendly groups. When each of these organizations concludes that “results are inconsistent” they are comparing studies based on superficial similarities but not on these demonstrated causal factors. What is being observed, therefore, is genuine biological heterogeneity, not inconsistency. It has been known since the beginning of modern science in the 16thcentury that how you do your studies is important in determining what results are obtained. How is it possible that ICNIRP, SCENIHR, the U.S. FCC, FDA and National Cancer Institute have forgotten this important fact?
The primary literature studies demonstrating roles of pulsation, frequency, polarization, cell type and intensity windows in determining biological effects are entirely dependent on having genuine effects to study. None of these studies could have been done without an effect to study. Consequently, the claims that there are no well-documented EMF effects are nonsense, based not only on the eight extremely well-documented effects summarized above, but also on the entire literature demonstrating the role of pulsation, frequency, polarization, cell type and intensity windows.
How do electromagnetic fields affect mitochondria?
Anytime one has the movement of charged particles one creates an electromagnetic field. People do not realize that electromagnetism is the foundation of life, it is what controls biochemistry. Imagine going into a room where you hear every kind of music being played really loudly, you wouldn’t be able to hear yourself or communicate with other people. This is what our cells are experiencing when they are in high EMF environments. They cannot function properly and they become very stressed. Energy is transduced into vibrations. Light waves and sound waves are converted into vibrations in the cell and these vibrations alter molecular structure and function. Every cell, every organelle, every molecule, resonates at certain frequencies. Mitochondria generate a field that’s stronger than lightning. This is about 30 million volts per meter. The mitochondrial membrane potential is the result of the charge difference between the inner and the outer membrane. This is about negative 140 millivolts. Literally this is pretty shocking right. – How much electric field in such a small space.
Where do mitochondria receive their energy from?
The natural EMF found on earth created life and these energies are imprinted onto every living organism on this planet. Every organism is chewing to the native Schumann frequency of the earth and the Sun. The native frequency of the earth and human is 7,83 Hz. This is what’s responsible for generating the mitochondria a strong electromagnetic field.
You have the flow of electrons going through the electron transport chain and you have the pumping of protons out of the matrix. Cellular water is also involved in creating coherence between neighboring mitochondria and other organelles as well.
Artificial EMF cause structural damage to mitochondria. They cause swelling cavitation and eventually the mitochondria begin to degenerate. This happens an as little as a few hours.
Man made EMF caused oxidation of the mitochondrial membrane and generate free radicals. Polyunsaturated fats which are found in the membrane are very prone to oxidation. Mitochondria also generate free radicals; however it’s only when it becomes too excessive, that it causes damage. Artificial EMF cause both educated calcium channels to open. Remember how we talked about vibrations before, well EMF can induce vibrations, that can cause these channels to open. EMF can also cause the formation of cores and membranes, so this can allow toxins in and it also affects the stability of the membrane. Calcium is an important signaling molecule, that’s involved in numerous cellular processes, everything from gene regulation to cell death.
Mitochondria regulate calcium in the cell. Anything that increases intracellular calcium damages mitochondria. Free radicals are always looking to fill in the missing hole that from losing an electron, so it’s going to cause a chain reaction – they’re going to steal from another molecule that molecule is going to feel from another molecule and it just keeps on going, but it’s only when this becomes excessive does it cause oxidative stress.
It’s important to also point out here that our OS is a reactive oxygen species. There are many different forms of free radicals that can come in and create the damage, like peryoxynitride nitrite.
Cytochrome C oxidase is the terminal enzyme in the respiratory chain and that transfers electrons to oxygen to make water and ATP and this enzyme is also impaired by EMF.
Mitochondrial DNA – MTDNA
Mitochondrial DNA is the most important genome. It’s not the nuclear genome and mitochondrial DNA can actually influence nuclear DNA. The circular form of the mitochondrial DNA and a lot of people when they think of DNA they think of chromosomes and the bundling and double helix.
Here is a schedule of the circular portion and it is just really important to keep in mind that all human beings and mammals got these two sets inside their bodies. All mammals and humans inherit their mitochondria from the maternal line only.
Mitochondria are easily damaged by oxidative stress caused by man-made EMF. Mitochondrial DNA mutations can also further exacerbate oxidative stress. We have talked about a few phenomena now and one can see how they are all interrelated. More mitochondrial DNA mutations lead to more defective mitochondria and more defective mitochondria means more defective cells.
More mutants you get into a particular cell within the mitochondria within the cell the greater the chance of disease (degenerative diseases and cancer. In reality there is in most cells like hundreds or even thousands of mitochondria in a cell. So over time, when these become damaged one potentially has this disease expression taking place. Oxidative stress, when it is too great, can lead to cell death. When the mitochondrial membrane potential which generates a strong electromagnetic field is decreased for any reason it signals pathways that lead to programmed cell death (apoptosis).
In summary, man-made EMS causes multiple problems in the cell. They are all interrelated that and they all cumulate in a cell death. One really needs to be mindful of one’s exposures to EMF.
Most of us are spending way too much time indoors, we’re exposed to cellphones, Wi-Fi, smart meters artificial light. We are not really meant to be indoors nonstop; we are meant to be outside like every other animal.
Also, one’s personal behaviors with technology looks like the inverse-square law. If one just even gets like several meters away from certain technology, the intensity of the EMFs will go way down dramatically. So, like seeing a person with a cell phone up to their head or in their hand are getting like direct exposure. To those, a non-native EMS or artificial man-made EMS. Keep that in mind; one’s personal EMF hygiene really plays a role in today’s modern world. Distance from EMS is your friend.
The EMF spectrum just keeps growing and growing and growing, because technology just keeps growing and growing. Different frequency bands are being bought. There’s a lot of competition among them, we’re talking hundreds of billions of dollars of competition.
How can we possibly repair our mitochondria?
You need to ground on earth regularly. You have to be barefoot on the earth or in the ocean. Daily sun light exposure. Morning noon and night you get different kinds of light at different times of the day. In the morning you get mostly infrared light and the midday you get a lot of UV and in the evening you get more infrared light again. Avoid blue light (computer and mobile phone screens).
It’s quite important to also ground away from the power grid outside of your home. Like a lot of people are trying grounding techniques and plugging in actually to the power grid and getting dirty electricity or stray voltage or other EMF that are still intersecting them, when they’re trying to ground indoors, if you if you don’t know your situation, it’s just more safe to go out into nature.
One wants to avoid artificial light between sunset and sunrise, use candles at night or battery-operated red lights. If we have to be in front of certain artificial lights we like to use blue blockers that block out approximately 400 to 550 nanometer light. Use a glass to block 550 nanometers and lower – to block all the blue and some green actually. You really need to block a blue light at night.
One also needs to get adequate sleep and rest at night. One needs to sleep in a room that’s completely dark. One should not be able to see the hand in front of your face. Your eyes are so sensitive, that they can detect as little as one to two photons. The really good point here is, when you sleep with your Wi-Fi router in your room or one’s mobile phone next to you, that is light coming in to you so do you want that light as well as disturbing one’s sleep.
The entire electromagnetic spectrum can be thought of in terms of physics and the only difference between the low frequencies and the really high frequencies are the wavelength.
We need to eat nutrient-dense food and eat only during the day time. Do intermittent fasting several times a week. Stop beating like mid-afternoon, a little more bio mitochondrial biogenesis. It shows in some of the research that fasting can have an influence there.
All relate to your circadian rhythm. You really need to normalize your circadian rhythm and this is going to help you repair your mitochondria. When you’re thinking of the repair and destruction that mitochondria in a lot of cases these are long-term events. You can’t think of this in terms of just a few weeks or a few months. Minimize the damage and increase the benefits. The mitochondria are really decades in the making, that’s why a lot of disease expressions don’t show up for like 10 or 20 years later.
These things have to be part of your daily practice. You also need to drink plenty of spring water. Water is a really good EMS mitigator. When the water is inside of you, within your cells are more hydrated, you’re going to be able to protect yourself against EMS a little better. Water takes on information. The electromagnetic fields present on earth, they are imprinted onto water. Water is very important.
You need to exercise or play outside. You should not be inside most of the time. The light mechanics go really deep here and beautifully, because when you are playing outside, you’re just in the sunlight. This actually helps to build that exclusion zone water in your cells, as well to give you that protection. You need the red light and the infrared light.
We are surrounded by an artificial EMF everywhere we go nowadays. It is really important to more concentrate on what you can control in your local life with this, because the environments you put yourself into. There are many things that can be done just understanding what exists there and implementing more EMF hygiene will go a long way. You can go down a rabbit hole trying to think of all the other stuff that is happening around us. Don’t go down the path of fear and go into conquering this. There are all these beneficial things that are right here on this slide that can be done to really help mitigate and against our modern life. One just needs to go outside, that’s basically the answer to mitigating EMS. Having sun even “touching” one’s skin or getting into one’s body. A lot of people get outside, they drive to work with their windows up and the windows blocks a lot of the UV and other wavelengths and they really are not getting the power of the sun. One really needs to be outdoors, out in nature. Preferably at the beach. Many people do not realize that the Earth’s field is strongest there actually, because the waves and the ocean help to create the Earth’s own electromagnetic field. At the beach, obviously one is going to have very little potential of artificial EMF impact. There are a lot of things that can be done depending on where one lives.
Robert Gorter:
Medically, there are a few things one can do:
- Cannabidiol (CBD) causes well-documented improvement of a person’s DNA repair mechanisms. My team and I found out that for an adult, 10 mg CBD twice a day orally as a food supplement
improved significantly one’s DNA repair mechanisms (www.PharmaNatura.org)
- Viscum album (European Mistletoe). Since the 1920’s, Viscum album has been used in cancer patients and there are hundreds of clinical studies documenting that; including large cohort studies. Essentially, mistletoe glycoproteins improve significantly the cellular part of the immune system (NK cells, dendritic cells, etc.) so that one’s natural anti-cancer defense mechanisms are so improved that often, even patients in stage 4 of their disease can go in complete remission (www.Gorter-Model.org) and for extensive video documentation go to (www.youtube.com/user/mccfilip). In addition, multiple studies have shown that the European mistletoe improves one’s DNA repair mechanisms many-fold.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/…/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is- safe/
https://www.dw.com/en/5g-networks-are-they-dangerous…/a-47981285
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405337
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29402696
Written and Compiled by *Martin L. Pall, PhD Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences Washington State University Address: 638 NE 41stAve., Portland OR 97232 USAmartin_pall@wsu.edu503-232-3883May 17, 2018
and
**Robert Gorter, MD, PhD, Professor emeritus University of California San Francisco Medical School (UCSF), etc. Internal Medicine, Family & Community Health, Public Health and AIDS Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Leading researcher in the field of the medical use of Cannabis and its Cannabinoids since 1971.